Sugarcane farmers in Miwani, Kisumu, have strongly objected to a proposal for residential development on over 100 acres of agricultural land
The protest erupted during a public consultation meeting held on Tuesday, which was organised by environmental consultants working on behalf of Safaricom Investment Cooperative Society, the new landowners. The meeting aimed to discuss land subdivision, fencing, beaconing, and murram grading but was abruptly cut short due to the farmers' strong opposition to the development plans.
The farmers, led by Zedekiah Otene, expressed concern that the land, currently designated for sugarcane farming, was being threatened by a change of use without official approval. They argued that no legal changes had been made to reclassify the land for residential purposes, making the proposal unlawful. Otene declared, "This is agricultural land, and there is no change of use. We reject this exercise in totality."
The opposition was supported by Kibos Sugar and Allied Industries Ltd (KSAIL), a major player in the region that relies on sugarcane from the contested land. Joyce Opondo, the company’s Group Corporate Affairs Manager, warned that permitting the conversion of agricultural land to residential development would have far-reaching consequences. "The land produces approximately 40,000 tonnes of sugarcane annually, which is critical for job creation, tax revenue, and foreign exchange," Opondo explained. "Allowing residential development would set a dangerous precedent, encouraging the conversion of more vital agricultural land into housing estates."
Local residents attending the forum echoed similar concerns. Michael Ngeso, a local resident, emphasised that the land should remain focused on agricultural use, stating, "Safaricom can engage in any agricultural activity, but not turn the land into residential plots."
Further dissatisfaction arose as the farmers questioned the transparency of the consultation process. They argued that the public participation was not adequately publicised and did not meet the required Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations. Moreover, the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) had not issued an EIA licence for the project, prompting farmers to refuse to complete questionnaires handed out by the consultants.
The farmers urged NEMA to adhere to the government’s Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA), which they believe should focus on preserving crucial agricultural zones to safeguard food security and economic stability. In closing, they called on Safaricom to reconsider the project, urging, “Let them withdraw from this project and allow the government to focus on food and cash crop production for the good of the nation.”